Main Article Content
This research examined the performance and durability of geopolymer mortars with fly ash (FA) and fly ash with recycled concrete powder (RCP) as a partial replacement for fly ash and/or the fine aggregate in the production of sustainable alternative mortars when compared with references based on ordinary portland cement (OPC). Mortar mixes were made by substituting binder and sand with RCP at varying ratios (25%, 50%, and 75%), and the mechanical and durability properties of the mortar mixtures were evaluated. The findings demonstrated that OPC-based mortars exhibited the highest performance, whereas the FA-based system activated with sodium silicate also presented significant strength with improved compactness and long-term stability. In contrast, high RCP content reduced reactivity, which highlights the importance of maintaining balanced binder proportions. There was also the use of geopolymer binders with the replacement of manufactured sand with FA fine aggregate (GFFA), 10–20% of manufactured sand, which resulted in enhanced mechanical performance and sustainability, as well as improved recycling of industrial by-products. Acid resistance tests confirmed the presence of stronger microstructural deterioration, such as gel dissolution and micro-cracking, compared with surface erosion, in influencing the reduction in strength. Furthermore, FA and RCP improved acid resistance capacity by refining microstructure and stabilizing binders. Overall, compressive strength retention proved to be a more reliable indicator of acid durability than mass loss. Therefore, properly designed FA-based mortars provide an effective, durable, and eco-friendly alternative to OPC, suitable for construction applications exposed to aggressive or challenging environments.
Article Details
Ababneh, A., Matalkah, F., & Aqel, R. (2020). Synthesis of kaolin-based alkali-activated cement: carbon footprint, cost and energy assessment. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 9(4), 8367‒8378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.116 (Crossref)
Abdalla, T. A., Shitote, S. M., Matallah, M., & Koteng, D. O. (2024). Effect on sulfuric acid resistance and shrinkage of concrete incorporating processed bagasse ash and silica fume. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2024(1), 5534536. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5534536 (Crossref)
Al-Bayati, M. A., Abdulrahman, M. B., Alzeebaree, R., & Arbili, M. M. (2022). The effect of materials and curing system on the behavior of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Journal of Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 31(1), 710‒718. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0206 (Crossref)
Alahmari, T. S., Abdalla, T. A., & Rihan, M. A. M. (2023). Review of recent developments regarding the durability performance of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete. Buildings, 13(12), 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123033 (Crossref)
Altawil, H., & Olgun, M. (2025). Optimization of mechanical properties of geopolymer mortar based on Class C fly ash and silica fume: A Taguchi method approach. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22, e04332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04332 (Crossref)
Ariffin, N., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Postawa, P., Zamree Abd Rahim, S., Mohd Arif Zainol, M. R. R., Putra Jaya, R., Śliwa, J., Omar M. F., Wysłocki, J. J., Błoch, K., & Nabiałek, M. (2021). Effect of aluminium powder on kaolin-based geopolymer characteristic and removal of Cu2+. Materials, 14(4), 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040814 (Crossref)
ASTM International. (1998). Standard test method for flexural strength of hydraulic-cement mortars (ASTM C348-98). ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0348-98
ASTM International. (2011). Standard Guide for Examination of Hardened Concrete Using Scanning Electron Microscopy (ASTM C1723-10). ASTM International.
ASTM International. (2013). Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete (ASTM C642-13). ASTM International.
ASTM International. (2016). Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens) (C109/C109M-16a). ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0109_C0109M-16A (Crossref)
ASTM International. (2022). Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete (ASTM C618-22). ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-22 (Crossref)
Bayapureddy, Y., Muniraj, K., & Gangireddy, M. M. (2023). Characteristic evaluation of concrete containing sugarcane bagasse ash as pozzolanic admixture. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, 9(4), 1287‒1307. https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2023.819ma0712 (Crossref)
Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control [COSQC]. (2019). Portland cement (IQS 5/2019). Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control.
Cunha, S., Kaptan, K., Hardy, E., & Aguiar, J. (2025). Physical, mechanical, and durability behavior of sustainable mortars with construction and demolition waste as supplementary cementitious material. Buildings, 15(15), 2757. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152757 (Crossref)
Davidovits, J. (1991). Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 37(8), 1633–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01912193 (Crossref)
Davidovits, J. (2020). Geopolymer chemistry and applications (5th ed.). Geopolymer Institute.
Delihowski, J., Izak, P., Wojcik, Ł., Stempkowska, A., & Jarosz, M. (2024). The influence of selected grain size fractions of coal fly ash on properties of clay-cement mortars used for the flood levees construction. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 21485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72315-0 (Crossref)
Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Palomo, A., & Deventer, J. S., van (2007). Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9), 2917‒2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z (Crossref)
Ebrahim, A. A. M., Ahmed, D. A., & Abu-Elwafa, R. (2024). Development of an eco-friendly geopolymer mortar using slag and fly ash with high bentonite content for thermal and environmental applications. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 26727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76780-5 (Crossref)
Kesikidou, F., Konopisi, S., & Anastasiou, E. K. (2021). Influence of concrete sludge addition in the properties of alkali‐activated and non‐alkali‐activated fly ash‐based mortars. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021(1), 5534002. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5534002 (Crossref)
Kumar, M. (2015). Geopolymer concrete: Leading the world towards a sustainable future. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 4(9), 302–306. (Crossref)
Ma, J., Zhang, H., Wang, D., Wang, H., & Chen, G. (2022). Rheological properties of cement paste containing ground fly ash based on particle morphology analysis. Crystals, 12(4), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040524 (Crossref)
Matos Riscado, A. L. L. de, Vieira, C. M. F., Monteiro, S. N., Azevedo, A. R. G. de, & Marvila, M. T. (2025). Parameter optimization for fly ash geopolymer mixtures: molarity, silica modulus, and solution/binder influence. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 20355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06076-9 (Crossref)
Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2006). Concrete microstructure, properties, and materials. McGraw-Hill.
Midhin, M. A. K., Wong, L. S., Ahmed, A. N., Jasim, A. M. D. A., & Paul, S. C. (2023). Strength and chemical characterization of Ultra High-Performance Geopolymer concrete: a coherent evaluation. Civil Engineering Journal, 9(12), 3254‒3277. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-020 (Crossref)
Naenudon, S., Vilaivong, A., Zaetang, Y., Tangchirapat, W., Wongsa, A., Sata, V., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2022). High flexural strength lightweight fly ash geopolymer mortar containing waste fiber cement. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e01121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01121 (Crossref)
Paramban, R. K., & Govindarajulu, K. V. (2024). Characteristic study of geopolymer fly ash fine aggregate and its influence on partial replacement of M-sand in the strength properties of mortar. Structures, 68, 107141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107141 (Crossref)
Provis, J. L., & Deventer, J. S. L. van (2014). Alkali-Activated Materials. State of the Art Report (RILEM TC 224-AAM). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7672-2 (Crossref)
Razak, S., Zainal, F. F., & Shamsudin, S. R. (2020). Effect of porosity and water absorption on compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymer and OPC paste. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 957(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/957/1/012035 (Crossref)
Sajedi, F., & Razak, H. A. (2011). Effects of curing regimes and cement fineness on the compressive strength of ordinary Portland cement mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 2036–2045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.043 (Crossref)
Shamsah, M., Kalfat, R., Subramaniam, K. V., & Hanumananaik, M. (2025). Calcium enhanced ambient cured fly ash based geopolymer binders. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 25603. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07854-1 (Crossref)
Sharma, A., Singh, P., & Kapoor, K. (2022). Utilization of recycled fine powder as an activator in fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 323, 126581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126581 (Crossref)
Siqueira, A. A. de, & Cordeiro, G. C. (2022). Sustainable cements containing sugarcane bagasse ash and limestone: Effects on compressive strength and acid attack of mortar. Sustainability, 14(9), 5683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095683 (Crossref)
Wan, X., Li, H., Che, X., Xu, P., Li, C., & Yu, Q. (2023). A study on the application of recycled concrete powder in an alkali-activated cementitious system. Processes, 11(1), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010203 (Crossref)
Zhang, Y., Wu, D., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y., Wang, S., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Influence of fly ash content on the durability of mortar specimens under dry/wet sulfate attack. Materials, 17(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010113 (Crossref)
Downloads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.