Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
The liquefaction analysis in infrastructure projects is crucial as a preventive action for damage, especially in Indonesia, an earthquake-prone country. A wide range of liquefaction analyses is usually applied in Indonesia, such as non-linear analysis to generate the pore water pressure ratio (ru) to assess the potential of liquefaction. However, this approach does not fully present the complex behavior of layered soil in the soil-effective stress framework. The shear strain ratio is important for offering a comprehensive understanding of soil liquefaction analysis. This research aims to examine the combination of ru and shear strain ratio to assess liquefaction in layered ground. The DEEPSOIL program is used to generate the dynamic properties in each layer. The results show a strong correlation between the ru and strain ratio in each depth and borehole. However, they have diverse values in connection with the period of the ground motion approach. As a result, the evaluation and combining approach in the non-linear seismic response analysis of the three boreholes indicates a full liquefaction condition at a particular depth.
Article Details
Bullock, Z., Liel, A. B., Porter, K. A., & Dashti, S. (2021). Site-specific liquefaction fragility analysis: Cloud, stripe, and incremental approaches. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 50(9), 2529‒2550. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3458 (Crossref)
Darendeli, M. B. (2001). Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. The University of Texas at Austin.
DEEPSOIL. (2024). A nonlinear and Equivalent Linear Seismic Site Response of 1-D Soil Columns, User Manual (Vol. 7). Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Dobry, R., Ladd, R. S., Yokel, F. Y., Chung, R. M., & Powell, D. (1982). Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method. Building Science Series. National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce, US Governmental Printing Office, Washington, DC. (Crossref)
Dwiyantoro, W., Fathani, T. F., & Adi, A. D. (2023a). Influence of groundwater table fluctuation on liquefaction potential analysis using cyclic stress approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1184(1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1184/1/012006 (Crossref)
Dwiyantoro, W., Fathani, T. F., & Adi, A. D. (2023b). Response Spectrum Design Based on Site Class and Site-Specific Analysis in the Transition Zone. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1244(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1244/1/012036 (Crossref)
Fitri, S. N. (2023). Shear strain evaluation on analysis of additional clay liner layer modeling in Ngipik landfill, Gresik. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering, 2023, 533–542. (Crossref)
Fitri, S. N., & Sawada, K. (2024). Evaluation and opportunities for soil liquefaction vulnerability research: lesson learned from Japan for Indonesia ‒ a bibliometric analysis. Proceedings of the 2024 11th International Conference on Geological and Civil Engineering, 2024, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68624-5_2 (Crossref)
Fitri, S. N., & Sawada, K. (2025). Comprehensive assessment for liquefaction vulnerability in Indonesia: empirical and element simulation approaches. Civil Engineering Journal, 11(1), 326‒345. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-01-019 (Crossref)
Fitri, S. N., & Wahyuni, F. (2022). Safety factors investigation based on FEM and LEM approach in toll road embankment slope. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(5), 1948–1966. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100518 (Crossref)
Fitri, S. N., Soemitro, R. A. A., Warnana, D. D., & Sutra, N. (2018). Application of microtremor HVSR method for preliminary assessment of seismic site effect in Ngipik landfill, Gresik. MATEC Web of Conferences, 195, 03017. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819503017 (Crossref)
Geotechnical Engineering Bureau, & New York State Department of Transportation. (2007). Liquefaction potential of cohesionless soils. Geotechnical design procedure CPD-9 (Revision 2).
Hashash, Y. M. A. (2024). Nonlinear and Equivalent Linear Seismic Site Response of One-Dimensional Soil Columns. Version 7.1. User manual. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://deepsoil.cee.illinois.edu/Files/DEEPSOIL_User_Manual_v7.pdf
Ilham, M., & Putra, D. P. E. (2024). Integration of fuzzy sets, AHP, and TOPSIS methods for estimation of liquefaction potential zones in Wates groundwater basin, Kulon Progo, special region of Yogyakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1378(1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1378/1/012006 (Crossref)
Jalil, A., Fathani, T. F., Satyarno, I., & Wilopo, W. (2021a). Equivalent-linear seismic ground response analysis in Palu area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 930(1), 012089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/930/1/012089 (Crossref)
Jalil, A., Fathani, T. F., Satyarno, I., & Wilopo, W. (2021b). Nonlinear site response analysis approach to investigate the effect of pore water pressure on liquefaction in Palu. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 871(1), 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/871/1/012053 (Crossref)
Jas, K., & Jana, A. (2024). Prediction of shear strain and excess pore water pressure response in liquefiable sands under cyclic loading using deep learning model. Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication, 10(46), 1729–1734. https://doi.org/10.3208/jgssp.v10.os-35-05 (Crossref)
Ko, K. W., & Kayen, R. E. (2024). Energy-based and strain-based methods for estimation of pore water Pressure within liquefied soil layers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 150(10), 04024086. https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11458 (Crossref)
Kramer, S. L., & Mayfield, R. T. (2007). Return period of soil liquefaction. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(7), 802‒813. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7(802) (Crossref)
Kusumawardani, R., Chang, M., Upomo, T. C., Huang, R. C., Fansuri, M. H., & Prayitno, G. A. (2021). Understanding of Petobo liquefaction flowslide by 2018.09. 28 Palu-Donggala Indonesia earthquake based on site reconnaissance. Landslides, 18(9), 3163‒3182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01700-x (Crossref)
Marasini, N., & Okamura, M. (2014). Liquefaction potential analysis and possible remedial measure for existing structure in Kathmandu Valley. International Journal of Landslide and Environment, 2(2 & 3), 32‒44.
Mei, X. (2018). Pore pressure generation and liquefaction analysis using nonlinear, effective stress-based site response analysis (doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Mei, X., Olson, S. M., & Hashash, Y. M. A. (2015, November 1‒4). Empirical curve-fitting parameters for a porewater pressure generation model for use in 1-D effective stress-based site response analysis. Paper presented at 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Mei, X., Olson, S. M., & Hashash, Y. M. A. (2018). Empirical porewater pressure generation model parameters in 1-D seismic site response analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 114, 563‒567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.011 (Crossref)
Mei, X., Olson, S. M., & Hashash, Y. M. A. (2020). Evaluation of a simplified soil constitutive model considering implied strength and pore-water pressure generation for one-dimensional (1D) seismic site response. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 57(7), 974‒991. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0893 (Crossref)
Mele, L., Lirer, S., & Flora, A. (2023). A simple procedure to calibrate a pore pressure energy-based model from in situ tests. Acta Geotechnica, 18(3), 1569‒1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01650-1 (Crossref)
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (2019). Map of Indonesia’s liquefaction vulnerability zone.
Mojtahedzadeh, N., & Siddharthan, R. (2021). Estimating free field seismic settlement history in a saturated layered soil profile. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 150, 106937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106937 (Crossref)
Oktarina, P., Fikri, F., & Istiarto, I. (2023). Correlation of excess pore water pressure ratio on flow liquefaction phenomenon in Sibalaya–Central Sulawesi Province. E3S Web of Conferences, 429, 04013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342904013 (Crossref)
Purwana, Y. M., Goro, G. L., Fitri, S. N., Setiawan, B., & Arbianto, R. (2022). Assessment of seismic loss in Surakarta school buildings. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(5), 1772‒1787. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100506 (Crossref)
Raza, H., & Ahmad, N. (2024). Assessment of seismic liquefaction hazard and ground response in subduction zone: A 1D non-linear effective stress approach. Engineering Research Express, 6(4), 045121. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad980a (Crossref)
Sarah, D., & Soebowo, E. (2013). Liquefaction due to the 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake: field occurrence and geotechnical analysis. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 6, 383‒389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2013.01.050 (Crossref)
Syahbana, A. J., Sari, A. M., Soebowo, E., Irsyam, M., Hendriyawan, H., & Asrurifak, M. (2019). The sensitivity of earthquake input motion correlation with arias intensity and amplification, case study: Yogyakarta Special Region. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(2), 022069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/2/022069 (Crossref)
Tsimopoulou, V., Mikami, T., Hossain, T. T., Takagi, H., Esteban, M., & Utama, N. A. (2020). Uncovering unnoticed small-scale tsunamis: field survey in Lombok, Indonesia, following the 2018 earthquakes. Natural Hazards, 103(2), 2045‒2070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04071-z (Crossref)
Wicaksono, A., Hardiyatmo, H. C., & Satyarno, I. (2023). Analysis of liquefaction potential in Opak Fault nearby area (case study: Solo-Yogyakarta-NYIA Kulon Progo Toll Road construction section I.2). E3S Web of Conferences, 429, 04008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342904008 (Crossref)
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.