Multi-response optimization of red mud and sand proportions in paving block production via response surface methodology (RSM)

Main Article Content

Erwin SUTANDAR
TAVIO
Daniel CHRISTIANTO


Keywords : response surface methodology, red mud, paving block, multi-response optimization, sustainable construction materials
Abstract

Rising cement and natural aggregate prices have intensified the need for sustainable and optimized paving block mixtures incorporating industrial by-products. This study investigates the multi-response optimization of red mud and stone content in paving block production using response surface methodology (RSM). Red mud, an alkaline by-product of the bauxite refining industry, was utilized as a partial cement replacement to reduce material consumption and environmental impact. The objective was to determine the optimal proportions that satisfy the performance requirements of SNI 03-0691-1996. An RSM-based experimental design evaluated the interactive effects of red mud substitution (0–20% by cement weight) and stone proportion on compressive strength, bulk density, water absorption, and abrasion resistance. Specimens were produced using portland composite cement, sand, stone, water, and pre-treated red mud. Regression models and response surface plots were developed for prediction and optimization. Results indicate that approximately 18.79% red mud replacement with an optimized aggregate proportion yields the best overall performance. The optimized mix achieved a 28-day compressive strength of 22.91 MPa, satisfying SNI class B criteria, while demonstrating reduced water absorption and abrasion loss. This study introduces a statistically robust multi-response RSM approach for sustainable paving block mix design.

Article Details

How to Cite
SUTANDAR, E., TAVIO, & CHRISTIANTO, D. (2026). Multi-response optimization of red mud and sand proportions in paving block production via response surface methodology (RSM). Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences (SREES), 35(3), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.11102
References

Arya, A., & L. K. Sahu. (2024). Sustainability in technological advancements. IJFMR – International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.36948/IJFMR.2024.V06I01.12528

Abouhelal, D., Kamel, W., & Bassioni, H. (2023). Informatic analysis and review of literature on the optimum selection of sustainable materials used in construction projects: Critical review. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.01.011

Aryanto, Sutandar, E., & Prasetijo, J. (2025). The influence of quartz powder addition on the production of paving blocks. Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 34(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.22630/SREES.10423

Aslami, M. (2023). Key role of construction industry in achieving the goal of sustainable energy worldwide. E3S Web of Conferences, 457, 02061. https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202345702061

Badan Standardisasi Nasional [BSN]. (1990). Metode pengujian analisis saringan Agregat halus dan kasar (SNI 03-1968). https://pdfcoffee.com/sni-03-1968-1990-analisa-saringan-agg-pdf-free.html?utm_source

Badan Standardisasi Nasional [BSN]. (1996). Bata beton (Paving block) (SNI 03-0691). https://dwikusumadpu.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/sni-03-0691-1996-paving-block.pdf

Badan Standardisasi Nasional [BSN]. (2004). Semen portland pozzolan (SNI 15-0302). https://wancik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/sni-15-0302-2004_semen-portland-pozolan.pdf

Gencel, O., Ozel, C., Koksal, F., Erdogmus, E., Martínez-Barrera, G., & Brostow, W. (2012). Properties of concrete paving blocks made with waste marble. Journal of Cleaner Production, 21(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.08.023

Huang, X., Li, J. S., Jiang, W., Chen, Z., Wan, Y., Xue, Q., Liu, L., & Poon, C. S. (2022). Recycling of phosphogypsum and red mud in low carbon and green cementitious materials for vertical barrier. Science of The Total Environment, 838 (Part 2), 155925. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.155925

lo, H., Sutandar, E., & Budi, G. S. (2024). Study of the effect of mineral admixture addition on paving blocks’ physical and mechanical properties. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 24(2), 941–956. https://doi.org/10.26418/JTS.V24I2.76545

Jaya, R. P., Munirwan, R. P., & Bunyamin, B. (2025). Challenges and solutions for using waste materials in various construction applications. Smart and Green Materials, 1(2), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.70028/SGM.V1I2.22

Khan, K., Khan, S., Ahmed, M., Ahmed, W., Khan, S., & Zaman, G. (2025). Multi-response optimization of carbon-nanotubes concrete: Study on mechanical properties and durability behaviors. Structural Concrete, 26(6), 7795–7815. https://doi.org/10.1002/SUCO.70185

Khayat, K. H., Meng, W., Vallurupalli, K., & Teng, L. (2019). Rheological properties of ultra-high-performance concrete – An overview. Cement and Concrete Research, 124, 105828. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2019.105828

Liu, Y., Naidu, R., & Ming, H. (2011). Red mud as an amendment for pollutants in solid and liquid phases. Geoderma, 163(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2011.04.002

Liu, Z., & Li, H. (2015). Metallurgical process for valuable elements recovery from red mud – A review. Hydrometallurgy, 155, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HYDROMET.2015.03.018

Meng, W., Samaranayake, V. A., & Khayat, K. H. (2018). Factorial design and optimization of ultra-high-performance concrete with lightweight sand. Materials Journal, 115(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.14359/51700995

Mohibullah, & Acharya, P. K. (2025). Red mud-ground granulated blast furnace slag-based geopolymer concrete: a comprehensive study on mechanical performance, durability and environmental impact. Innovative Infrastructure Solution, 10, 503. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41062-025-02322-1

Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley.

Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Building empirical models. In Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments (pp. 13–62). Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

Nandurkar, B. P., Raut, J. M., Hinge, P. K., Bahoria, B. V., Patil, T. R., Upadhye, S., Vairagade, V. S., & Shelare, S. D. (2025). Optimization and predictive performance of fly ash-based sustainable concrete using integrated multitask deep learning framework with interpretable machine learning techniques. Scientific Reports, 15, 30820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16678-y

Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of concrete. Pearson.

Nofrianto, H., & Hutrio, H. (2023). Analisis mutu paving block dengan variasi agregat halus [Quality analysis of paving block with variations of fine aggregate]. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Vokasi, 1(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.21063/JTV.2023.1.1.54-62

Oleh, D., Ridwan, M., & Harimukti, N. (2022). Komparasi mutu paving block penambahan abu batu antara metode mekanis dan konvensional [Comparison of the quality of paving block with additional stone dust between the mechanical and conventional method]. Universitas Islam Indonesia. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/41552

Power, G., Gräfe, M., & Klauber, C. (2011). Bauxite residue issues: I. Current management, disposal and storage practices. Hydrometallurgy, 108(1–2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HYDROMET.2011.02.006

Regulacion, R. E., & Oreta, A. W. C. (2013). Application of response surface methodology: Optimum mix design of concrete with slag as coarse aggregate. In B.H.V. Topping & P. Iványi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing (Paper 169). Civil-Comp Press. https://doi.org/10.4203/ccp.102.169

Sunkpho, J., Thangavel, P., Kumar, D. R., Wipulanusat, W., & Doh, J. H. (2026). Sustainable use of red mud in concrete: Assessing mechanical strength, durability, and performance through machine learning models. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 4(2), 100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GRETS.2025.100283

Sutar, H., Mishra, S. C., Sahoo, S. K., Chakraverty, A. P., & Maharana, H. S. (2014). Progress of red mud utilization: An overview. Chemical Science International Journal, 4(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.9734/ACSJ/2014/7258

Topçu, I. B., & Uygunoǧlu, T. (2010). Effect of aggregate type on properties of hardened self-consolidating lightweight concrete (SCLC). Construction and Building Materials, 24(7), 1286–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2009.12.007

Tw, A. R. P., Irianti, L., Sebayang, S., & Isneini, M. (2023). Pengaruh penggunaan Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), semen modifikasi jenis III dan IV, dan Portland Composite Cement (PCC) terhadap kuat tekan beton. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil dan Desain, 11(4), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrsdd.v11i4.3759

Venkatesh, C., Nerella, R., & Chand, M. S. R. (2021). Role of red mud as a cementing material in concrete: a comprehensive study on durability behavior. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00371-2

Viyasun, K., Anuradha, R., Thangapandi, K., Kumar, D. S., Sivakrishna, A., & Gobinath, R. (2021). Investigation on performance of red mud based concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 39, 796–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.09.637

Wang, X. (2025). Application of environmentally friendly building materials in urban construction. Applied and Computational Engineering, 126(1), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2025.20030

Yang, C., Zeng, Q., Hu, J., & Zhu, W. (2025). Study on performance optimization of red mud–mineral powder composite cementitious material based on response surface methodology. Buildings, 15(13), 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132339

You, Z., Dai, Q., & Xiao, F. (2018). Advanced paving materials and technologies. Applied Sciences, 8(4), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8040588

Zhang, J., Yao, Z., Wang, K., Wang, F., Jiang, H., Liang, M., Wei, J., & Airey, G. (2021). Sustainable utilization of bauxite residue (Red Mud) as a road material in pavements: A critical review. Construction and Building Materials, 270, 121419. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.121419

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.