Use of an ejector to reduce the time of air injection during testing of the containment system at nuclear power plants

Main Article Content

Sergii Surkov
Volodymyr Kravchenko
Iryna Korduba
Andrii Golovchenko
Oleksandr Butenko
Serhii Tsybytovskyi
Yuliia Trach


Keywords : airtight enclosure system, air injection time, optimal ejector design
Abstract

The containment system (CS) is the last barrier to the release of radioactive substances into the environment in the event of a nuclear accident. After each overload, this system is tested for its ability to perform its functions by determining the integral leakage, which should not exceed a certain value. The tests are performed at an overpressure in the CS of 0.72 kgcm–2, which is achieved by injecting air with a compressor. The paper considers the use of an ejector to accelerate the injection process, which has a positive effect on the technical and economic performance of a nuclear power plant (NPP) power unit by increasing the amount of electricity generated, which is very important today, when the NPPs provide the maximum share of electricity generated in the country. Previous studies have evaluated the use of an ejector for this purpose, but they did not consider the need to install filters on the intake air stream. In addition, they used numerical methods that generate an error. The present work uses a mathematical apparatus that provides a more accurate result. The obtained calculated compressor injection time coincides with the actual injection time for the Rivne NPP power units. The design of the ejector ensures the minimum injection time is determined. The optimal ejector module is equal to 8.6 (the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the cylindrical mixing chamber to the critical cross-sectional area of the working air nozzle). This reduces the injection time by 38.8%. The suction air must be free of dust and moisture. Suitable filters have a total aerodynamic resistance of 0.2 bar. Taking these air filters into account slightly reduces the efficiency of the ejector. The final time of air injection using the ejector is 2.56 h, which reduces the time of air injection for testing by 35.5%.

Article Details

How to Cite
Surkov, S., Kravchenko, V., Korduba, I., Golovchenko, A., Butenko, O., Tsybytovskyi, S., & Trach, Y. (2024). Use of an ejector to reduce the time of air injection during testing of the containment system at nuclear power plants. Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences (SREES), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.9956
References

Bernat, M., Nagy, S., & Smulski, R. (2023). Use of a New Gas Ejector for a TEG/TREG Natural Gas Dehydration System. Energies, 16 (13), 5011. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16135011

Butenko, O. G., & Smyk, S. Y. (2015). Improvement of the central ejector efficiency under nonoptimal operating modes. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, 2, 57–61.

Carpenter, C. (2020). Installation of gas ejector provides boost to low-pressure gas well. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 72 (11), 69–70. https://doi.org/10.2118/1120-0069-JPT

Gupta, P., Kumar, P., & Rao, S. M. (2022). Artificial neural network model for single-phase real gas ejectors. Applied Thermal Engineering, 201 (Part A), 117615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117615

Kravchenko, V. P., Vlasov, A. P., Holovchenko, A. M., Mazurenko, A. S., Dubkovsky, V. O., & Chulkin, O. O. (2023). Status and prospects of testing the hermetic enclosure system of the reactor plant with VVER-1000 for tightness. Nuclear and Radiation Safety, 2 (98), 53–60.

Kravchenko, V., Vlasov, A., Andryuschenko, A., Vlasov, D., Golovchenko, A., & Gavrilov, P. (2022). Reduced air injection time during containment testing due to the use of an ejector. Proceedings of Odessa Polytechnic University, 1 (65), 62–69.

Li, H., Zhao, Y. & Hu, D. (2024). Simulation and analysis of pressure waves in flow channels of axial and radial gas wave ejectors. Recent Patents on Engineering (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0118722121321712240724075604

Novruzova, S. G., & Qadashova, E. V. (2020). Possibility of vortex separation ejector application in the collection and separation of gas. News of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Series of Geology and Technical Sciences, 5 (443), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-170X.115

Ping, W. & Macdonald, B. (2020, October 25). Giving a boost to low pressure gas well by installing gas ejector [Conference session]. SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Bali, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2118/196440-MS

Sammak, M., Ho, C., Dawood, A., & Khalidi, A. (2021). Improving combined cycle part load performance by using exhaust gas recirculation through an ejector. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, 84966, V004T06A012. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2021-59358

Shi, H., Wang, R., Xiao, Y., Zhu, X., Zheng, R., Song, C., & Liu, Z. (2024). Optimization of exhaust ejector with lobed nozzle for marine gas turbine. Brodogradnja, 75 (3), 75303. http://dx.doi.org/10.21278/brod75303

Shirokov, S. V. (1997). Yadernyye energeticheskiye reaktory [Nuclear power reactors]. KPI.

Van den Berghe, J., Dias, B. R., Bartosiewicz, Y., & Mendez, M. A. (2023). A 1D model for the unsteady gas dynamics of ejectors. Energy, 267, 126551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126551

Voropaiev, G. O., Zagumennyi, I. V., & Rozumnyuk, N. V. (2021). Modeling of gas – dynamic processes in the elements of impulse ejector. Journal of Numerical and Applied Mathematics, 1 (135), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.17721/2706-9699.2021.1.08

Wang, Z., Wang, S., Li, Y., Chen, L., & Zhang, H. (2021). Design and numerical investigation of ejector for gas pressurization. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 16 (3), e2625. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.2625

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Recommend Articles